I understand these are different, however splitting them out like this gives us (the admins) a more accurate picture of the state of our computers.Īs an addition to this, it would be handy to be able to either add new, or edit existing states. (180) days" remains the sameĪdditionally "Set Computers to non-active if not found in Active Directory." could be changed to "Set Computers to Decommissioned if not found in Active Directory." " and "Set computers to non-active if not seen in the last. " becomes "Set computers to disabled if disabled in Active Directory. So "Set computers to non-active if disabled in Active Directory. Perhaps a better idea would be to split these out and use a different status for each. (180) days" along with "Set computers to non-active if disabled in Active Directory." and "Set Computers to non-active if not found in Active Directory." We currently use "Set computers to non-active if not seen in the last. However I don't want systems that have been out of the office for over 180 days (that's the age we use) to be excluded. but I don't want to include non-active systems I build a number of reports that specifically include all states accept non-active - For example if I'm doing an OS audit, I want to include systems in the shop for repair, I also want to include systems that are off site etc. Assets with a state other than "active" are excluded from most reports, if this is what you're referring to. We have a small number of systems that aren't seen by our network for months at a time it would be handy to be able to tag these using the existing "state" functionality if possible so they don't get missed when we need to report on all active systems.Ĭould you please elaborate on what you mean by this.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |